> ## Documentation Index
> Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://docs.safesquid.com/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.

# Elevated Privacy

> Use SafeSquid Elevated Privacy to block third-party cookies, suppress referrer data, and reduce user-agent exposure with profile-aware deployment.

# Reduce tracking without breaking everything

## Problem statement

Many websites and third-party services track user behavior through cookies, referrer headers, and user-agent details. That exposure can weaken privacy posture and increase unnecessary data disclosure, but aggressive privacy controls can also break federated login, embedded services, and browser-specific web behavior if rolled out carelessly.

## Client scenario

Use Elevated Privacy when you need to:

* block third-party cookies
* reduce referral leakage to external sites
* reduce browser fingerprint exposure
* apply stronger privacy controls to selected users or traffic profiles

## Key benefits

Elevated Privacy gives SafeSquid a graduated privacy model instead of a single all-or-nothing switch. That lets administrators tighten privacy where it matters while still allowing business exceptions where SSO, third-party identity providers, or application compatibility require them.

## Prerequisites

### Client-side preparations

* Identify the user groups, applications, and websites that depend on third-party sign-in or third-party cookies.
* Choose pilot users first before broad rollout.

### SafeSquid-side setup

* Confirm the Elevated Privacy section is available and enabled only when you are ready to test it.
* Decide which profiles need strict privacy and which need a bypass.

## Setup instructions

### Enable the global section

Set the Elevated Privacy global **Enabled** field to `TRUE`.

<img src="https://mintcdn.com/safe-squid-labs-12a0916f/MsY6j1Y5JyckYLph/images/Configure/Restriction_Profiles/Elevated_Privacy/image1.webp?fit=max&auto=format&n=MsY6j1Y5JyckYLph&q=85&s=03aff9fe322987619ed8130ae1bf5bdb" alt="Elevated Privacy restriction profile or configuration" width="838" height="68" data-path="images/Configure/Restriction_Profiles/Elevated_Privacy/image1.webp" />

Without the global switch, policy entries do not take effect.

### Create privacy policies in top-down order

Elevated Privacy entries are evaluated from top to bottom, so place narrow exceptions above broad privacy rules when a business workflow must stay functional.

<img src="https://mintcdn.com/safe-squid-labs-12a0916f/MsY6j1Y5JyckYLph/images/Configure/Restriction_Profiles/Elevated_Privacy/image2.webp?fit=max&auto=format&n=MsY6j1Y5JyckYLph&q=85&s=88bd779bc8805c1911c069f223f85933" alt="Elevated Privacy policy or profile options" width="837" height="161" data-path="images/Configure/Restriction_Profiles/Elevated_Privacy/image2.webp" />

### Choose the privacy level deliberately

Available privacy levels are:

* `NOT_REQUIRED`: disable Elevated Privacy for matching traffic
* `LOW`: block third-party cookies only
* `STANDARD`: block third-party cookies and hide HTTP and HTTPS referrer information
* `PARANOID`: block third-party cookies, hide referrer information, and hide different user agents

Use `PARANOID` carefully. Some websites and applications depend on user-agent behavior and can malfunction when that signal is suppressed or normalized.

### Build a strict privacy rule where it is appropriate

For high-privacy use cases, create a rule that applies a stronger privacy level to a dedicated profile.

The existing example remains useful:

* remove third-party cookies
* hide referrer data
* modify user-agent exposure

That helps reduce online tracking but can also break sign-in paths that depend on third-party cookies.

<img src="https://mintcdn.com/safe-squid-labs-12a0916f/MsY6j1Y5JyckYLph/images/Configure/Restriction_Profiles/Elevated_Privacy/image3.webp?fit=max&auto=format&n=MsY6j1Y5JyckYLph&q=85&s=31112d62e199cd41e56a547209ad0c4a" alt="Elevated Privacy rule or entry configuration" width="1043" height="152" data-path="images/Configure/Restriction_Profiles/Elevated_Privacy/image3.webp" />

### Create a bypass for known business exceptions

Some sites require third-party identity providers for login. In those cases, create a bypass profile rather than weakening privacy globally.

The existing example remains valid: connections tagged with a bypass profile can skip Elevated Privacy where third-party authentication is required.

<img src="https://mintcdn.com/safe-squid-labs-12a0916f/MsY6j1Y5JyckYLph/images/Configure/Restriction_Profiles/Elevated_Privacy/image4.webp?fit=max&auto=format&n=MsY6j1Y5JyckYLph&q=85&s=7e2357251d068972e1583cfac02063d8" alt="Elevated Privacy save or apply configuration" width="1053" height="166" data-path="images/Configure/Restriction_Profiles/Elevated_Privacy/image4.webp" />

## Verification and validation

### Positive tests

Test a site where privacy controls should apply.

Expected result:

* third-party cookies are blocked at the selected privacy level
* referrer exposure is reduced when using `STANDARD` or `PARANOID`
* the privacy policy applies only to the intended users or profiles

### Negative tests

Test a site that relies on federated or third-party login.

Expected result:

* the site fails when strong privacy is enforced, if it genuinely depends on third-party cookies
* the site works again when the intended bypass profile is applied

That negative test is important because it proves both the restriction and the exception path.

## Troubleshooting guide

### Users cannot sign in to sites that use external identity providers

Likely causes:

* third-party cookies are being blocked
* the wrong privacy level is applied
* the bypass profile is missing or placed too low in rule order

Isolation steps:

* identify whether the site uses third-party SSO
* inspect which privacy rule actually applied
* test the same site with and without the bypass profile

Remediation:

* add or correct the bypass profile
* move the exception above the broad rule
* retest the login flow

### Websites behave differently or render incorrectly

Likely causes:

* `PARANOID` mode is suppressing user-agent behavior needed by the site
* referrer suppression changes the application flow

Isolation steps:

* compare behavior under `STANDARD` and `PARANOID`
* identify whether user-agent-dependent content is involved

Remediation:

* reduce the privacy level for that workflow
* scope `PARANOID` mode to only the users or sites that truly need it

## Related controls / next steps

* Use [Access Restriction](/Access_Restriction) and [Request Profiles](/Request_Profiles) to scope privacy controls more precisely.
* Use [Security Logs](/Security_Logs) and privacy-related records to validate that the right policy path applied.


## Related topics

- [Elevated privacy](/admin_guide/filtering_and_privacy/elevated_privacy.md)
- [Login Issues on Specific Websites](/troubleshooting/unable_to_login_specific_website.md)
- [Application Binaries and Modules](/safesquid_swg/files_and_folders/application_binaries_and_modules.md)
- [Security Logs](/use_cases/audit_and_forensics/security_logs.md)
- [Debug response headers](/admin_guide/start_here/debug_response_headers.md)
